Stop Losing Critical Evidence

In many cases yes, from account and device evidence rather than assumption. Sign-in and audit logs record timestamps, IP addresses, device types, application clients, and approximate geography; devices record pairings, session tokens, remote-access sessions, and configuration changes. Attribution is built by correlating those records with known devices and networks, password and recovery changes, forwarding and delegation rules, and physical access. Where the record supports one person and excludes others, we say so; where it only narrows the field, we say that too.

A forensic examination looks for the artifacts monitoring leaves behind: installed monitoring or remote-administration software, management profiles and enrollment, unexpected paired devices and active sessions, jailbreak or root indicators, unauthorized accounts, altered security settings, disabled protections, unusual background processes and outbound connections, and unauthorized backup or synchronization. It also tests the innocent explanations — a shared account, an old backup, a family-sharing setting, or a still signed-in device — because knowing which one applies determines what you should do next.

Do not factory reset, wipe, reinstall, or hand the device to a repair shop, and avoid running cleanup or antivirus removal tools, all of which can destroy the very artifacts that prove the intrusion. Preserve the device in its current state, keep any suspicious messages, emails, notifications and screenshots with their original files, and immediately request or download account activity and security logs from your providers, since those retention windows are short. Then contact us before anyone else handles the device.

Yes, and these matters are handled with particular care for the person's safety. Examinations commonly cover stalkerware and monitoring app detection, location-sharing and tracker discovery, shared account and family-sharing exposure, spoofed or anonymized message tracing, unauthorized access to email and cloud photos, and documentation suitable for a protective order petition or a criminal referral. We produce findings that a court can act on, and we work with counsel, advocates, and law enforcement as the client directs.

Yes. Business unauthorized-access work covers former employees retaining credentials or cloud access, privilege misuse, insider data access outside job scope, compromised email and OAuth application grants, unauthorized remote access into servers or VPN, and access by third-party vendors. We collect and analyze authentication and directory logs, endpoint telemetry, cloud audit logs, and the endpoints themselves, then deliver a report suitable for internal action, litigation, insurance, or law enforcement referral.

Yes. The examination is conducted to evidentiary standards from the start: write-blocked acquisition, hash verification, documented chain of custody, and a report stating methodology, tool versions, findings and limitations, with exhibits. That record supports a criminal referral, a protective order, a civil claim under state computer-crime and privacy statutes, or an employment action, and our examiner can testify to it in state or federal court if the matter proceeds.

Yes. Every examiner who performs unauthorized access investigation work at Elite Digital Forensics is a certified digital forensic examiner and a former state or federal law enforcement forensic examiner. Our examiners have been accepted as expert witnesses in state and federal courts and have qualified under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert standard, and the equivalent state reliability standards. The examiner who performs the work is the examiner who signs the report and testifies to it.

Across the team our examiners hold CFCE (Certified Forensic Computer Examiner), EnCE (certified computer examiner credential), GCFE (GIAC Certified Forensic Examiner), CCME and MCFE (certified mobile device examiner credentials), ACE (certified forensic examiner credential), FBI-certified digital forensic examiner training and Computer Analysis Response Team qualification, plus CompTIA A+, Network+ and Security+, CCNA/CCNP-level networking credentials, and cloud practitioner certification — supported by continuing forensic education in mobile, computer, cloud, network and multimedia forensics.

Yes. We use validated, widely peer-reviewed forensic acquisition and analysis platforms that federal and state forensic laboratories rely on, and we confirm any material finding with a second independent method. Tool names and versions, hash values, validation steps, and known tool limitations are documented in the report, and every conclusion traces back to the underlying artifact so the court is never asked to accept a software conclusion on faith.

Evidence is logged, photographed, and assigned a unique evidence number at intake, acquired using write-blocked forensically sound methods, and hash verified with MD5, SHA-1 and SHA-256 at acquisition and again before analysis. All analysis is performed on a verified working copy, never the original. Chain of custody is documented in an unbroken written record of every transfer and examination event and is produced with the report. Images and case files are stored on AES-256 class encrypted media in our access-controlled laboratory, transferred only over encrypted channels, and securely destroyed or returned at the end of the agreed retention period.

All three. We are retained directly by private individuals with no attorney involved, by law firms and attorneys as consulting and testifying experts under work-product protection, and by businesses for internal, insurance, and litigation matters. We accept cases nationwide, ship evidence with documented chain of custody, perform on-site collection where required, and testify in state and federal courts across the country. Consultations are free and confidential — call (833) 292-3733.